Travesty of Justice

Sorry Neo.
Is there another video with a commentator who has any clue how to present this story??

This guy loses everybody listening within the first 60 seconds of what it is about.

Mrgunsandgear has other You-Tubers speaking out against him.

It doesn't have anything to do with what he stands for, it has to do with what, and how, he does
his presentations.

Good intentions of exposing the bullshit of the Biden Administration, but Mrgunsandgear,
imho, is not the person to use as he gives ammo to the real liberal crazies who call us conservatives
crazy.

He is a liberal's dream in showing just how fucked-up conservatives can be.

A video that exposes his harm to what is right.


Mrgunsngear ...... Go F*ck Yourself! (Self Promotional Whore) - YouTube

 

This is what I mean.
He is right. He speaks truth. But he speaks in the same way Joe Biden does!
Watch this.



He has been falsely accused, but his response is as garbled in meaning as a Joe Biden speech.

 

worst parody of justice is the Rittenhouse case. The dude killed TWO PEOPLE and he is celebrated as a hero by some. That is just wrong

 

He defended himself against those who chased him down the street trying to kill him.
Please read the depositions and testimony given to the jury.
The jury acquitted him based on the FACTS.
Not based on the liberal media lies of calling him a murderer.

It is a perfect example of how our justice system works better than any where else in the world.

 

Why was he there with a gun? These people were in their neighborhood when they saw an armed guy. Maybe they wanted to defend their neighborhood.
The Justice system is flawed. Murderers are celebrated as heroes, and the victims are blamed for trying to defend their neighborhood against an armed dude.

 

You have that 180 degrees out of direction.

He was there to protect te store owners from the looters and rioters.
He SHOULD NOT have been there as it wasn't his responsibility and he was not of that area.

But, when he was DEFENDING the stores, the rioters attacked him. He is not a murderer. The rioters who chased him down the street
were trying to kill him.

Again, read the deposition of his trial. He was the victim. Why do you liberals continue to yell "Fake News" against
the reports from the court of law?

You have been presented the truth from the State Court and yet you refuse to believe the court ruling.

 

The Court, yeah. It is the jury. And look at the jury. Probably all people who have their NRA card.
But yeah, okay, maybe, MAYBE, he is no a murderer. But still, he didn't try to wound them, he shot to kill.
He shouldn't have been there at all. He just wanted to 'feel manly' by going there to 'protect' the stores with his gun.
If he had stayed at home, no one would have died. A store with broken windows is not as harsh as humans dying

 

You just proved my point. No matter the proof, a liberal will never accept reason when it goes against their thinking.
As stated before. Far Left and Far Right are at the top of a nearly closed horseshoe of political standing.
Neither one will accept proof. They will always find a flaw, even if it only in their closed minds.

A gun hater has no clue about shooting a gun.
They cannot grasp that;

1) When your life is threatened, split-second decision to shoot or not needs to be made.
2) If that decision is yes, there is no time to take even 2 seconds to perfectly aim.
3) One has to aim a "Large Body Mass". It is impossible to "Shoot them in the leg" by aiming as they are running towards you.
4) Shooting to "Wound them" in a split-second decision when your life is on the line, never enters your mind. Ask any soldier or police officer.

I stated, and I agree 100% with that...

Said every person who has been in: a car crash, got the flu by someone sneezing on them, got on a doomed airplane,
was in a bar fight they lost, saw their friend killed in a street fight, etc. etc. etc.

Correct. But when that person who is breaking a window to either destroy or loot your business usually will
attack you if you stand in their way.
At that point, the attacker values your things more than he values his own life.

 

That County (or Parish) Sheriff needs to be recalled out of their position, and pronto.

I hope she goes jury and ends up with higher than the suit.

 

My only answer to all of that is simple: If the thief has a gun, he can kill you easily. If you have a gun, you can kill him easily. If none have guns, it is not as easy to kill, and people can react and come to your help WITHOUT having anyone dying.

 

But the entire problem with this "Remove all guns" concept you have, sorry to say it this way, but, it 100% totally out of reality.

To remove guns from the populace, law must be made that everyone relinquish ALL their firearms to the government.

OK, that takes care of all the law abiding citizens. That reduces the guns in circulation by, let's say, 80%.

So now that 20% leaves around 78,000,000 firearms in the hands of only the criminals.

Someone encountering a burglar breaking into their home, or a robber on the street, is now at a 99% chance that
the criminal will have a gun and the criminal has a 99% chance the person he is robbing is not another criminal
and will not have a gun for defense.

Over 393,000,000 firearms are in the hands of USA citizens.
There is no realistic way to collect them all.

And this is all without consideration it is in our Constitution for the right to bear (own) firearms.

 

I think the Founding Fathers wouldn't like how the 2nd is used today. There are many things they wouldn't like about the country today, and some they would like.